Click Here Header
Rebecca Consult Rebecca Milton Sales Rep
Schedule a Free Consultation With One of our Reps Now!
 

Sleeping With The Enemy

1/15/10

Todays Trucking.com

Features > 01/15/2010

Sleeping With the Enemy  - by Marco Beghetto
01/15/2010
How many hours a week do you, or your drivers, spend waiting at docks?
1-10
10-15
15-plus
view results

For a very long time Marc Paquin knew something was wrong. He just didn't know what. After shutting down his rig and bunking down at the end of the day, disjointed interludes of feather-light sleep would often get interrupted by forgettable nightmares, bouts of cold-sweated panic and shortness of breath.

Whenever the 10-year trucking veteran awoke, his clock would show he had slept for eight or nine hours, but his wobbly knees and severe exhaustion told him that it couldn't be.

"I would drive two or three hours and had to go back to bed for a couple of hours." he says. "The fatigue never left me."

Then, while on a run through Toronto in 2001, Paquin had -- quite literally -- a rude awakening. "Without knowing how or why, I found myself in my truck, overturned on the highway."

Upon return to Montreal, his fleet manager wanted to know what had happened. There wasn't much Paquin could say except that he had blacked out.

Soon after, Paquin was diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which, as the trucking community is now coming to realize with more frequency, is a sleep disorder that causes the closing of the airway passage at the back of the throat, leading to cessation of breathing during sleep. You're usually not conscious of your inability to draw a breath, which can occur dozens of times an hour for periods that can be as long as a minute each.

It was discovered that Paquin, severely affected, stopped breathing 36 times for every hour he slept. Effectively, the truck driver was getting just over an hour's sleep in an eight-hour period. Hours-of-service downtime meant nothing in his world.

"I felt like my working days were endless," he recalls. "I needed 15 hours to drive 600 miles. And I often stopped to nap. If I had to wait five minutes at a customer, I leaned within the framework of the door and I slept."

Although the troubling symptoms persisted for years, Paquin, like most truck drivers afflicted with the disorder, knew little, if anything, about sleep apnea until he was diagnosed with it.

With treatment, he can breath easier now. But the same can't be said for the hundreds of thousands of other unsuspecting North American drivers who probably have the disorder.

According to Dr. Allan Pack, director of the Sleep Center at the University of Pennsylvania, roughly 28 percent of commercial drivers are likely afflicted with some degree of sleep apnea. The disease is most common in overweight males with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 or larger and a collar size more than 17 in. Loud snoring, frequent night wakings, shortness of breath, and of course, unexplainable daytime fatigue are all telltale signs.

CPAP machines are the most common form of
OSA treatment, but they're not too comfortable at first.

More recently, studies have drawn clear lines between OSA-related fatigue and vehicle crashes. A Cambridge University study concluded that car and truck drivers who suffer from sleep apnea are as much as seven times more likely to be involved in an accident.

That number, points out Don Osterberg of Schneider National, would likely be even higher if the study focused specifically on commercial drivers who, since they're generally more obese and lead less healthy lifestyles than the average citizen, are over represented in the aggregate sleep apnea percentage.

Osterberg, who as VP of safety and training runs one of the few fleet-managed sleep-apnea screening and treatment programs for truck drivers in North America (see sidebar, pg.40), says fatigue is the primary causal factor in 36 percent of high-severity accidents. And much of that, his experience tells him, has to do with undiagnosed sleep apnea.

The OSA proportion among truck drivers has arguably reached epidemic-like levels. And that hasn't gone unnoticed by the
U.S. government.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) began working on a rule this summer that toughens the current 15-year-old physical qualification rules for drivers. And all signs point to a mandatory sleep-apnea screening rule as part of that mandate.
The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, based on recommendations from medical experts, is slated for publication this month or in January.

It's unclear what the final standard will look like, but there are strong indications that new drivers seeking their CDL would have to undergo screening for sleep apnea at the medical exam level; while the existing pool of drivers could eventually be monitored by their carrier companies for screening and ongoing treatment much like how existing drug-testing rules work. (Depending on the severity, drivers with OSA could still be permitted to work if they're in a treatment program).

The issue is also top of mind in Canada, where government and industry officials are watching the proceedings in the U.S. very closely.

Stephen Laskowski of Ontario Trucking Association (OTA) doesn't know if there's genuine appetite to put forth similar Canadian legislation but he says, "we'll still have to deal with it one way or another.

"The question is how? Whether we mandate it or not, what we need is reciprocity [with the U.S.]," he says. "We need the government of Canada and the provinces to at least get behind a made-in-Canada [screening] program that can be recognized."

LEGAL LIMBO

As more attention is paid to the problem, carriers, including Canadian cross-border haulers, find themselves in legal limbo waiting for concrete federal guidelines while at the same time trying to insulate themselves from overly litigious trial lawyers.

There's little doubt, says Indianapolis-based labor lawyer Angela Cash, that plaintiffs' attorneys are sharpening their claws as the dangers of sleep apnea become more familiar. In fact, trial lawyers are using the available OSA literature -- some which suggests that extremely fatigued drivers could threaten highway safety as much as drunk drivers do -- to their Machiavellian advantage in court.

"[Plaintiffs' attorneys] love these kinds of stats and studies because it allows them to say 'drunk' six times during the trial even if the [driver] didn't have a drop of alcohol pass through his lips," Cash tells Today's Trucking.

The safety related justification for OSA testing is
obvious, but the liability ramification should be just
as clear for anyone operating in the U.S.

A handful of cases have already tested this approach, with varying degrees of success, she says. Clearly, though, lawyers are increasingly winning judgments by claiming carriers are vicariously liable if their drivers are involved in fatigue related accidents -- and more so if drivers are diagnosed with OSA.

"It's kind of a Neverland for carriers because there's enough information out there that suggests this is a problem, so it opens up the question [of liability] if you have such information on a driver and perhaps look the other way."

Even the mistake of "not noticing" could cause the gavel to come down on you. The sort of "information" a carrier is supposed to be alerted to is also open to interpretation. In one case involving a fatality, a judge dismissed a carrier's "sudden emergency" defence even though the driver didn't make the company aware of his OSA condition.

The plaintiffs' lawyer reasoned, and the judge agreed, that a single fatigue-related accident on the driver's abstract should have raised flags. Cash says that any fatigue or health-related communication between the driver (or his family) and the company -- unexplained accidents, dispatch correspondence related to tiredness, or frequent sick days or lateness records -- could convince a judge or jury that a company "should have known."

Fatigue wasn't even an issue in another tragic case in New Mexico where a truck driver suffered a heart attack and struck a road worker after he lost control of his vehicle. Both the trucker and worker died, but that didn't stop the families' lawyers from going after the carrier, arguing that the heart attack was a result of an underlying OSA condition the employer should have been aware of.

Luckily for the company there was little evidence to link OSA and the heart attack, but, if anything, the case shows that plaintiffs' attorneys "are being creative in connecting what dots they can with regard to sleep apnea to get to liability," says Cash. "And now there's a lot more dots for them to follow."

This is all the more reason to move ­forward quickly on a federal rule that provides clear procedural guidelines for carriers, says Osterberg.

That's not to say trial lawyers won't circle around anyway, but a legal road map drawn up by the feds would better protect carriers who do their due diligence.

TESTING, TESTING

For Canadian-based NAFTA haulers -- as any carrier required to test U.S.-bound drivers for drugs knows all too well -- things could get even more complicated if mandatory OSA testing gets on the books in either country.

Outside of insurance costs, the issue north of the 49th isn't so much crash liability -- claims are usually controlled by legislation and Canadian courts don't hand out the punitive damages the Americans do -- but there are health and safety pitfalls to mind.

Like drug and alcohol dependence, sleep apnea has already been ruled to be a "perceived" disability by Provincial Human Rights Commissions, says Christopher Andree, a partner with mega law firm Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP.

In Dashwood Industries Ltd. v. United Steelworkers of America, an Ontario arbitrator found that OSA was a disability under health and safety legislation, and therefore all the reasonable anti-discrimination rules, including a prohibition on random testing, would apply.

"It would fall in the same category as drug testing," says Andree. "If you tried to test for sleep apnea, you'd face the same kind of challenge that you are perceiving someone to have a disability; and if they do have a real disability you have to accommodate them."

How do you accommodate someone who can't sleep or is constantly fatigued? Andree speculates: "My immediate reaction would be to say, for example, you can't let them keep the same driving hours because they might get tired much faster than someone who gets a normal amount of sleep."

The anti-discrimination angle isn't lost on Angela Cash in regards to U.S. protections. That's why until legislators pass a firm mandate, she recommends that carriers who want to preemptively protect their liability adopt either an "all-in" policy -- screening all drivers regardless of whether they fit the profile for OSA -- or the less expensive, but perhaps riskier approach of addressing drivers on a case-by-case basis, depending on the apparent evidence that a sleep disorder could be a factor.

"You can't just assume that just because someone shares physical characteristics with those who generally test higher for sleep apnea, that you should to test for it," she says.

Taking action in advance of FMCSA legislation surely seems complicated. Plus, any testing and treatment policy involving owner-operators involves putting your foot down on an entirely separate legal minefield. Just ask the carriers in both the U.S. and Canada who have watched courts and arbitrators rule that independent contractors need to be treated like company drivers -- and, in some cases, even unionized -- because the company may have exercised what was deemed to be too much day-to-day control over the owner-ops.

Still, it's apparent that not having any screening and treatment policy at all, even in the absence of a government directive, is a big gamble if your drivers travel on U.S. roadways.

"Quite frankly," says Cash, "with target defendants like trucking companies, unless you can go in there and prove there is absolutely no evidence that you could have known or suspected a driver [involved in a crash] had sleep apnea, then it's very risky because juries want to hold trucking companies responsible because they put people out there behind the wheel of those big rigs.

"I don't think juries will look kindly on trucking companies that in their opinion turn a blind eye."

Montreal trucker Marc Paquin is one big rig operator who's glad his sleep problems, while made plainly apparent once they spilled out on the highway, didn't lead to any serious injuries or land him in a court room before he could get medical treatment and overcome his "enemy."

Sounding a bit like an infomercial, Paquin says, very genuinely: "The results are fantastic. I am alert and energetic all day long.

"If you have several of the symptoms of sleep apnea, you should not hesitate," he says. "The examination lasts one night and your life will be completely changed."

One down. A few hundred thousand to go.

">
Features > 01/15/2010

Sleeping With the Enemy  - by Marco Beghetto
01/15/2010
How many hours a week do you, or your drivers, spend waiting at docks?
1-10
10-15
15-plus
view results

For a very long time Marc Paquin knew something was wrong. He just didn't know what. After shutting down his rig and bunking down at the end of the day, disjointed interludes of feather-light sleep would often get interrupted by forgettable nightmares, bouts of cold-sweated panic and shortness of breath.

Whenever the 10-year trucking veteran awoke, his clock would show he had slept for eight or nine hours, but his wobbly knees and severe exhaustion told him that it couldn't be.

"I would drive two or three hours and had to go back to bed for a couple of hours." he says. "The fatigue never left me."

Then, while on a run through Toronto in 2001, Paquin had -- quite literally -- a rude awakening. "Without knowing how or why, I found myself in my truck, overturned on the highway."

Upon return to Montreal, his fleet manager wanted to know what had happened. There wasn't much Paquin could say except that he had blacked out.

Soon after, Paquin was diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which, as the trucking community is now coming to realize with more frequency, is a sleep disorder that causes the closing of the airway passage at the back of the throat, leading to cessation of breathing during sleep. You're usually not conscious of your inability to draw a breath, which can occur dozens of times an hour for periods that can be as long as a minute each.

It was discovered that Paquin, severely affected, stopped breathing 36 times for every hour he slept. Effectively, the truck driver was getting just over an hour's sleep in an eight-hour period. Hours-of-service downtime meant nothing in his world.

"I felt like my working days were endless," he recalls. "I needed 15 hours to drive 600 miles. And I often stopped to nap. If I had to wait five minutes at a customer, I leaned within the framework of the door and I slept."

Although the troubling symptoms persisted for years, Paquin, like most truck drivers afflicted with the disorder, knew little, if anything, about sleep apnea until he was diagnosed with it.

With treatment, he can breath easier now. But the same can't be said for the hundreds of thousands of other unsuspecting North American drivers who probably have the disorder.

According to Dr. Allan Pack, director of the Sleep Center at the University of Pennsylvania, roughly 28 percent of commercial drivers are likely afflicted with some degree of sleep apnea. The disease is most common in overweight males with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 or larger and a collar size more than 17 in. Loud snoring, frequent night wakings, shortness of breath, and of course, unexplainable daytime fatigue are all telltale signs.

CPAP machines are the most common form of
OSA treatment, but they're not too comfortable at first.

More recently, studies have drawn clear lines between OSA-related fatigue and vehicle crashes. A Cambridge University study concluded that car and truck drivers who suffer from sleep apnea are as much as seven times more likely to be involved in an accident.

That number, points out Don Osterberg of Schneider National, would likely be even higher if the study focused specifically on commercial drivers who, since they're generally more obese and lead less healthy lifestyles than the average citizen, are over represented in the aggregate sleep apnea percentage.

Osterberg, who as VP of safety and training runs one of the few fleet-managed sleep-apnea screening and treatment programs for truck drivers in North America (see sidebar, pg.40), says fatigue is the primary causal factor in 36 percent of high-severity accidents. And much of that, his experience tells him, has to do with undiagnosed sleep apnea.

The OSA proportion among truck drivers has arguably reached epidemic-like levels. And that hasn't gone unnoticed by the
U.S. government.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) began working on a rule this summer that toughens the current 15-year-old physical qualification rules for drivers. And all signs point to a mandatory sleep-apnea screening rule as part of that mandate.
The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, based on recommendations from medical experts, is slated for publication this month or in January.

It's unclear what the final standard will look like, but there are strong indications that new drivers seeking their CDL would have to undergo screening for sleep apnea at the medical exam level; while the existing pool of drivers could eventually be monitored by their carrier companies for screening and ongoing treatment much like how existing drug-testing rules work. (Depending on the severity, drivers with OSA could still be permitted to work if they're in a treatment program).

The issue is also top of mind in Canada, where government and industry officials are watching the proceedings in the U.S. very closely.

Stephen Laskowski of Ontario Trucking Association (OTA) doesn't know if there's genuine appetite to put forth similar Canadian legislation but he says, "we'll still have to deal with it one way or another.

"The question is how? Whether we mandate it or not, what we need is reciprocity [with the U.S.]," he says. "We need the government of Canada and the provinces to at least get behind a made-in-Canada [screening] program that can be recognized."

LEGAL LIMBO

As more attention is paid to the problem, carriers, including Canadian cross-border haulers, find themselves in legal limbo waiting for concrete federal guidelines while at the same time trying to insulate themselves from overly litigious trial lawyers.

There's little doubt, says Indianapolis-based labor lawyer Angela Cash, that plaintiffs' attorneys are sharpening their claws as the dangers of sleep apnea become more familiar. In fact, trial lawyers are using the available OSA literature -- some which suggests that extremely fatigued drivers could threaten highway safety as much as drunk drivers do -- to their Machiavellian advantage in court.

"[Plaintiffs' attorneys] love these kinds of stats and studies because it allows them to say 'drunk' six times during the trial even if the [driver] didn't have a drop of alcohol pass through his lips," Cash tells Today's Trucking.

The safety related justification for OSA testing is
obvious, but the liability ramification should be just
as clear for anyone operating in the U.S.

A handful of cases have already tested this approach, with varying degrees of success, she says. Clearly, though, lawyers are increasingly winning judgments by claiming carriers are vicariously liable if their drivers are involved in fatigue related accidents -- and more so if drivers are diagnosed with OSA.

"It's kind of a Neverland for carriers because there's enough information out there that suggests this is a problem, so it opens up the question [of liability] if you have such information on a driver and perhaps look the other way."

Even the mistake of "not noticing" could cause the gavel to come down on you. The sort of "information" a carrier is supposed to be alerted to is also open to interpretation. In one case involving a fatality, a judge dismissed a carrier's "sudden emergency" defence even though the driver didn't make the company aware of his OSA condition.

The plaintiffs' lawyer reasoned, and the judge agreed, that a single fatigue-related accident on the driver's abstract should have raised flags. Cash says that any fatigue or health-related communication between the driver (or his family) and the company -- unexplained accidents, dispatch correspondence related to tiredness, or frequent sick days or lateness records -- could convince a judge or jury that a company "should have known."

Fatigue wasn't even an issue in another tragic case in New Mexico where a truck driver suffered a heart attack and struck a road worker after he lost control of his vehicle. Both the trucker and worker died, but that didn't stop the families' lawyers from going after the carrier, arguing that the heart attack was a result of an underlying OSA condition the employer should have been aware of.

Luckily for the company there was little evidence to link OSA and the heart attack, but, if anything, the case shows that plaintiffs' attorneys "are being creative in connecting what dots they can with regard to sleep apnea to get to liability," says Cash. "And now there's a lot more dots for them to follow."

This is all the more reason to move ­forward quickly on a federal rule that provides clear procedural guidelines for carriers, says Osterberg.

That's not to say trial lawyers won't circle around anyway, but a legal road map drawn up by the feds would better protect carriers who do their due diligence.

TESTING, TESTING

For Canadian-based NAFTA haulers -- as any carrier required to test U.S.-bound drivers for drugs knows all too well -- things could get even more complicated if mandatory OSA testing gets on the books in either country.

Outside of insurance costs, the issue north of the 49th isn't so much crash liability -- claims are usually controlled by legislation and Canadian courts don't hand out the punitive damages the Americans do -- but there are health and safety pitfalls to mind.

Like drug and alcohol dependence, sleep apnea has already been ruled to be a "perceived" disability by Provincial Human Rights Commissions, says Christopher Andree, a partner with mega law firm Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP.

In Dashwood Industries Ltd. v. United Steelworkers of America, an Ontario arbitrator found that OSA was a disability under health and safety legislation, and therefore all the reasonable anti-discrimination rules, including a prohibition on random testing, would apply.

"It would fall in the same category as drug testing," says Andree. "If you tried to test for sleep apnea, you'd face the same kind of challenge that you are perceiving someone to have a disability; and if they do have a real disability you have to accommodate them."

How do you accommodate someone who can't sleep or is constantly fatigued? Andree speculates: "My immediate reaction would be to say, for example, you can't let them keep the same driving hours because they might get tired much faster than someone who gets a normal amount of sleep."

The anti-discrimination angle isn't lost on Angela Cash in regards to U.S. protections. That's why until legislators pass a firm mandate, she recommends that carriers who want to preemptively protect their liability adopt either an "all-in" policy -- screening all drivers regardless of whether they fit the profile for OSA -- or the less expensive, but perhaps riskier approach of addressing drivers on a case-by-case basis, depending on the apparent evidence that a sleep disorder could be a factor.

"You can't just assume that just because someone shares physical characteristics with those who generally test higher for sleep apnea, that you should to test for it," she says.

Taking action in advance of FMCSA legislation surely seems complicated. Plus, any testing and treatment policy involving owner-operators involves putting your foot down on an entirely separate legal minefield. Just ask the carriers in both the U.S. and Canada who have watched courts and arbitrators rule that independent contractors need to be treated like company drivers -- and, in some cases, even unionized -- because the company may have exercised what was deemed to be too much day-to-day control over the owner-ops.

Still, it's apparent that not having any screening and treatment policy at all, even in the absence of a government directive, is a big gamble if your drivers travel on U.S. roadways.

"Quite frankly," says Cash, "with target defendants like trucking companies, unless you can go in there and prove there is absolutely no evidence that you could have known or suspected a driver [involved in a crash] had sleep apnea, then it's very risky because juries want to hold trucking companies responsible because they put people out there behind the wheel of those big rigs.

"I don't think juries will look kindly on trucking companies that in their opinion turn a blind eye."

Montreal trucker Marc Paquin is one big rig operator who's glad his sleep problems, while made plainly apparent once they spilled out on the highway, didn't lead to any serious injuries or land him in a court room before he could get medical treatment and overcome his "enemy."

Sounding a bit like an infomercial, Paquin says, very genuinely: "The results are fantastic. I am alert and energetic all day long.

"If you have several of the symptoms of sleep apnea, you should not hesitate," he says. "The examination lasts one night and your life will be completely changed."

One down. A few hundred thousand to go.

A Truckers Take on Sleep Apnea

January 2010

RT

by Bob Stanton

A CMV driver questions the guidelines on apnea testing for long-distance truckers.

Are individuals with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) at more risk of crash than are comparable individuals who do not have the disorder?

Studies on the general driving population are in agreement on this point. When you narrow the search to studies done on commercial motor vehicle (CMV) operators, you get a much different result. The Medical Expert Panel (MEP) convened by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Medical Review Board (MRB) found only one of two studies showed CMV operators with a higher risk of crash.1 A major issue in the trucking community is that the FMCSA Sleep Apnea Crash Risk Study,2 which found "no statistical evidence in the data to suggest that drivers with sleep apnea are more likely than drivers without sleep apnea to have a commercial vehicle crash," is not even listed or discussed in the MRB literature review.

Crashes reported to police are used as the metric to measure motor carrier safety performance in justifying the OSA testing guidelines, but transportation safety literature indicates that 65% to 80% of crashes between CMV and passenger vehicles were the fault of the passenger vehicle.

BMI Triggers Mandatory PSG

The OSA screening guidelines adopted by the FMCSA MRB mandate that all CMV operators with a body mass index (BMI) >30 undergo a PSG.

There was not consensus among the MRB on the 30 cut point for testing. The cut point was suggested by Barbara Phillips, MD, and adopted over the objections of one MRB member.3 The MEP recommendation was for a cut point of 33. The cut point of 30 is also not in agreement with the screening guidelines in the Joint Task Force (JTF) report.4 The winter 2009 issue of Wake Up Call5 has a more in-depth discussion of this topic.

There are approximately 3.5 million CMV operators. The OSA screening program at Schneider National Carriers6 found 46% had a BMI >30, but the sleep screening program also found 15% of drivers screened for OSA, given PSG, and found positive for OSA had a BMI <30. Using BMI alone will miss large numbers of CMV operators who have OSA and should get treatment. Since the Wake Up Call article, a new study by Parks et al6 validates the accuracy and specificity of the JTF screening procedures.

The question is why a nonspecific and inaccurate screening guideline (BMI), which appears to lack a consensus on cut point, has been adopted when an apparent consensus report (JTF) is available with much different screening recommendations.

Rates of Driver Fatigue

The Large Vehicle Crash Causation Study (LVCCS)7 is often cited in OSA literature to justify CMV-OSA testing. Many transportation industry experts have discounted the study as highly flawed. The LVCCS found fatigue was an associated causal factor for the large vehicle operator in only 7.5% of the accidents—at the bottom of the top 10 factors. Why call for OSA testing for just CMV operators? The literature supports a causal link between OSA and crash involvement for the general driving public, and the general driving public is two times as likely to be driving fatigued. Mandatory OSA testing of passenger vehicle drivers—not CMV operators—is better supported by the literature.

Educate and Persuade Drivers

One of the interesting outcomes of the Parks study was a finding of virtually 0% CPAP compliance among CMV operators who were given no support in obtaining the required PSG or CPAP treatment. Compare this to a 91% CPAP compliance rate in the Schneider National program, which has pretesting education, driver manager involvement, a driver-to-driver peer counseling network, and all costs for OSA testing and treatment covered by health insurance. The Schneider program is self-funding through reductions in health care costs for the comorbidities associated with untreated OSA. Unfortunately, this type of program is not practical for the entire trucking industry, which is dominated by small motor carriers with 20 or fewer trucks.

Remove Barriers for Drivers

Commercial motor vehicle operators do not seek OSA testing as there is hiring discrimination against drivers with OSA. While this is a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), there is little enforcement. One method of discrimination is for trucking companies to require maintaining a 2-year DOT medical certification. Current MRB guidelines for OSA require issuing a 1-year certification with annual review of CPAP compliance and effectiveness of treatment. The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission investigates ADA complaints, and having the commission take a more public stance in vigorous enforcement is needed.

Truck drivers are part of the "working poor" who often cannot afford medical insurance. Forty percent of truck drivers work for firms with fewer than five trucks. Many of these are one-truck owner operators; 25% of these have no medical insurance coverage.8 Of the truck drivers who do have medical insurance, it is often "limited benefit" coverage.

Call for a Review of the MRB Guidelines

The process used by the MRB in developing the OSA guidelines did not allow for review of the proposal or the supporting literature, or allow for discussion of alternatives. FMCSA often uses what they call "listening sessions" to get stakeholders on an issue together to review a regulatory topic. OSA testing and treatment guidelines might be one topic to consider reviewing after holding such a listening session.


Bob Stanton is a truck driver who was diagnosed with OSA in 2002. He operates a CMV in interstate commerce, delivering freight throughout the contiguous United States.

The opinions in this article are the author's and do not represent positions of any specific trucking industry group, his employer, or this publication.

References

  1. Ellen RLB, Marshall SC, Palayew M, et al. Systematic review of motor vehicle crash risk in persons with sleep apnea. J Clinl Sleep Med 2006;2:193-200.
  2. Ancoli-Israel S, Czeisler CA, George CFP, Guilleminault C, Pack AI. Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Safety. Expert Panel Recommendations. Presented to Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration January 14, 2008. Available at: www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/TOPICS/mep/report/Sleep-MEP-Panel-Recommendations-508.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2009.
  3. US Department of Transportation. Sleep Apnea Crash Risk Study. Publication No. FMCSA-RT-04-007. September 2004. Available at: www.fmcsa.dot.gov/facts-research/briefs/SleepApneaCrash-RiskStudy-TechBrief.htm. Accessed September 23, 2009.
  4. Meeting Minutes, FMCSA Medical Review Board Meeting. January 28, 2008. Available at: www.mrb.fmcsa.dot.gov/012808_meeting.htm.
  5. Hartenbaum N, Collop N, Rosen JM. Sleep apnea and commercial motor vehicle operators: statement from the joint Task Force of the American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, and the National Sleep Foundation, J Occupa Environ Med. 2006; 48(suppl 9): S4-37..
  6. Wake Up Call. Winter 2009. Available at: www.sleepapnea.org/support/newsletter.html. Accessed September 23, 2009.
  7. Parks P, Durand G, Tsismenakis AJ, Vela-Bueano A, Kales S. Screening for obstructive sleep apnea during commercial driver medical cxaminations. J Occupa Environmen Med. 2009;51:275-82.
  8. Report to Congress on the Large Truck Crash Causation Study MC-R/MC-RRA March 2006, Available at: www.fmcsa.dot.gov/facts-research/research-technology/report/ltccs-2006.htm. Accessed September 23, 2009.
  9. Executive Summary. 2007 Independent Driver Survey.Owner Operator Independent Driver's Association. Available at: www.ooida.com/OOIDA Foundation/Recent_Research/recent_research.html. Accessed September 23, 2009
">

A Trucker's Take on Apnea Testing

by Bob Stanton

A CMV driver questions the guidelines on apnea testing for long-distance truckers.

Are individuals with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) at more risk of crash than are comparable individuals who do not have the disorder?

Studies on the general driving population are in agreement on this point. When you narrow the search to studies done on commercial motor vehicle (CMV) operators, you get a much different result. The Medical Expert Panel (MEP) convened by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Medical Review Board (MRB) found only one of two studies showed CMV operators with a higher risk of crash.1 A major issue in the trucking community is that the FMCSA Sleep Apnea Crash Risk Study,2 which found "no statistical evidence in the data to suggest that drivers with sleep apnea are more likely than drivers without sleep apnea to have a commercial vehicle crash," is not even listed or discussed in the MRB literature review.

Crashes reported to police are used as the metric to measure motor carrier safety performance in justifying the OSA testing guidelines, but transportation safety literature indicates that 65% to 80% of crashes between CMV and passenger vehicles were the fault of the passenger vehicle.

BMI Triggers Mandatory PSG

The OSA screening guidelines adopted by the FMCSA MRB mandate that all CMV operators with a body mass index (BMI) >30 undergo a PSG.

There was not consensus among the MRB on the 30 cut point for testing. The cut point was suggested by Barbara Phillips, MD, and adopted over the objections of one MRB member.3 The MEP recommendation was for a cut point of 33. The cut point of 30 is also not in agreement with the screening guidelines in the Joint Task Force (JTF) report.4 The winter 2009 issue of Wake Up Call5 has a more in-depth discussion of this topic.

There are approximately 3.5 million CMV operators. The OSA screening program at Schneider National Carriers6 found 46% had a BMI >30, but the sleep screening program also found 15% of drivers screened for OSA, given PSG, and found positive for OSA had a BMI <30. Using BMI alone will miss large numbers of CMV operators who have OSA and should get treatment. Since the Wake Up Call article, a new study by Parks et al6 validates the accuracy and specificity of the JTF screening procedures.

The question is why a nonspecific and inaccurate screening guideline (BMI), which appears to lack a consensus on cut point, has been adopted when an apparent consensus report (JTF) is available with much different screening recommendations.

Rates of Driver Fatigue

The Large Vehicle Crash Causation Study (LVCCS)7 is often cited in OSA literature to justify CMV-OSA testing. Many transportation industry experts have discounted the study as highly flawed. The LVCCS found fatigue was an associated causal factor for the large vehicle operator in only 7.5% of the accidents—at the bottom of the top 10 factors. Why call for OSA testing for just CMV operators? The literature supports a causal link between OSA and crash involvement for the general driving public, and the general driving public is two times as likely to be driving fatigued. Mandatory OSA testing of passenger vehicle drivers—not CMV operators—is better supported by the literature.

Educate and Persuade Drivers

One of the interesting outcomes of the Parks study was a finding of virtually 0% CPAP compliance among CMV operators who were given no support in obtaining the required PSG or CPAP treatment. Compare this to a 91% CPAP compliance rate in the Schneider National program, which has pretesting education, driver manager involvement, a driver-to-driver peer counseling network, and all costs for OSA testing and treatment covered by health insurance. The Schneider program is self-funding through reductions in health care costs for the comorbidities associated with untreated OSA. Unfortunately, this type of program is not practical for the entire trucking industry, which is dominated by small motor carriers with 20 or fewer trucks.

Remove Barriers for Drivers

Commercial motor vehicle operators do not seek OSA testing as there is hiring discrimination against drivers with OSA. While this is a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), there is little enforcement. One method of discrimination is for trucking companies to require maintaining a 2-year DOT medical certification. Current MRB guidelines for OSA require issuing a 1-year certification with annual review of CPAP compliance and effectiveness of treatment. The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission investigates ADA complaints, and having the commission take a more public stance in vigorous enforcement is needed.

Truck drivers are part of the "working poor" who often cannot afford medical insurance. Forty percent of truck drivers work for firms with fewer than five trucks. Many of these are one-truck owner operators; 25% of these have no medical insurance coverage.8 Of the truck drivers who do have medical insurance, it is often "limited benefit" coverage.

Call for a Review of the MRB Guidelines

The process used by the MRB in developing the OSA guidelines did not allow for review of the proposal or the supporting literature, or allow for discussion of alternatives. FMCSA often uses what they call "listening sessions" to get stakeholders on an issue together to review a regulatory topic. OSA testing and treatment guidelines might be one topic to consider reviewing after holding such a listening session.


Bob Stanton is a truck driver who was diagnosed with OSA in 2002. He operates a CMV in interstate commerce, delivering freight throughout the contiguous United States.

The opinions in this article are the author's and do not represent positions of any specific trucking industry group, his employer, or this publication.

References

  1. Ellen RLB, Marshall SC, Palayew M, et al. Systematic review of motor vehicle crash risk in persons with sleep apnea. J Clinl Sleep Med 2006;2:193-200.
  2. Ancoli-Israel S, Czeisler CA, George CFP, Guilleminault C, Pack AI. Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Safety. Expert Panel Recommendations. Presented to Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration January 14, 2008. Available at: www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/TOPICS/mep/report/Sleep-MEP-Panel-Recommendations-508.pdf. Accessed September 23, 2009.
  3. US Department of Transportation. Sleep Apnea Crash Risk Study. Publication No. FMCSA-RT-04-007. September 2004. Available at: www.fmcsa.dot.gov/facts-research/briefs/SleepApneaCrash-RiskStudy-TechBrief.htm. Accessed September 23, 2009.
  4. Meeting Minutes, FMCSA Medical Review Board Meeting. January 28, 2008. Available at: www.mrb.fmcsa.dot.gov/012808_meeting.htm.
  5. Hartenbaum N, Collop N, Rosen JM. Sleep apnea and commercial motor vehicle operators: statement from the joint Task Force of the American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, and the National Sleep Foundation, J Occupa Environ Med. 2006; 48(suppl 9): S4-37..
  6. Wake Up Call. Winter 2009. Available at: www.sleepapnea.org/support/newsletter.html. Accessed September 23, 2009.
  7. Parks P, Durand G, Tsismenakis AJ, Vela-Bueano A, Kales S. Screening for obstructive sleep apnea during commercial driver medical cxaminations. J Occupa Environmen Med. 2009;51:275-82.
  8. Report to Congress on the Large Truck Crash Causation Study MC-R/MC-RRA March 2006, Available at: www.fmcsa.dot.gov/facts-research/research-technology/report/ltccs-2006.htm. Accessed September 23, 2009.
  9. Executive Summary. 2007 Independent Driver Survey.Owner Operator Independent Driver's Association. Available at: www.ooida.com/OOIDA Foundation/Recent_Research/recent_research.html. Accessed September 23, 2009

Trucking Headlines

5/12/10

ETrucker

ETrucker